ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

A ISO 9001 Standards quality policy and its corresponding quality objectives are established to direct the organization towards two specific goals of a quality management system:

-Provision of products – goods and services – that meet customer and applicable legal requirements, and

- Enhancement of customer satisfaction

The quality policy and the objectives are also a means of controlling the quality management system’s processes. Simply, if you want to control a process, assign an objective to it (or more) and make sure it is aligned to the quality policy, then monitor and measure the process’ performance against the assigned objective. You need to provide adequate resources to the process to ensure that it is capable of achieving the objective. You continually improve the whole process by upgrading the objective, make corrective and preventive actions or introduce innovation to it. Corrective action addresses an undesirable situation’s cause in order to prevent its recurrence. Preventive action, by contrast, addresses the probable cause of a potentially undesirable situation. This is what the quality policy and objectives are supposed to do. They provide focus, direction and control.

The quality objectives need to be consistent with the quality policy and the commitment to continual improvement, and their achievement needs to be measurable. The achievement of quality objectives can have a positive impact on product quality, operational effectiveness and financial performance and thus on the satisfaction and confidence of interested parties. When an organization has established a quality policy and a set of operational objectives, this means the only thing left to do is to design or plan the necessary processes or tasks that can realize those objectives. Therefore, the processes determine if the objectives will be met in full, partially or not at all. This is where the ISO 9001 standard play a critical role in specifying the required processes and the operating criteria. This is what ISO 9001 is all about. It even specifies criteria for the policy and the objectives.

A quality policy needs to satisfy the following requirements:

• It is appropriate to the purpose of the organization,
• It includes a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system,
• It provides a framework for establishing and reviewing quality objectives,
• It is communicated and understood within the organization, and
• It is reviewed for continuing suitability

Quality objectives must be established in order to enable the organization to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system. Quality objectives must achieve four things:

• Enable the organization to meet customer requirements
• Enable the organization to enhance customer satisfaction
• Enable the organization to comply with all legal requirements applicable to the product
• Continually contribute to the effectiveness of the quality management system

Therefore, when you are in the meeting room with your management brainstorming on the appropriate objectives, have these four points in mind.

ISO 9001:2000 requires that management periodically review changes to both the policy and objectives. An organization’s objectives must be measurable and its processes designed to meet those objectives. An organization’s overall business goals, quality objectives and quality policy are all interrelated and must work together to achieve business improvement. To do this, it’s necessary to understand which processes are key to achieving business goals and align those processes with the quality objectives. It means aligning business goals, quality objectives and process measures to create real improvement. And it means using process mapping. Process mapping involves more than just flow charting. Among other things, it can manage and improve processes by illustrating process measures as well as process flows and interactions. One process-mapping method begins by involving the people who work in the process. Another entails mapping the process as is, taking action to improve it and then preparing a final map of the improved process.

Process owners are directly responsible for the attainment of the objectives. They must be given adequate resources, including competent human resources. They need to review the objectives periodically to ensure the key performance indicators are heading towards their objectives on schedule. If not, they need to initiate corrective actions and if the risks of non-achievement are visible, take preventive actions to control them and steer the KPI’s back on course.

Examples of quality objectives:

• Production rejects <>
• Machine breakdown <>
• Returned products = 0/mth
• Purchasing >95% on-time delivery
• Inventory damage = 0/mth

Conclusion: ISO 9001 requires that the quality management system achieves its objectives in order to realize the quality policy.

ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

ISO 9001 Standards – Quality Policy and Objectives

A ISO 9001 Standards quality policy and its corresponding quality objectives are established to direct the organization towards two specific goals of a quality management system:

-Provision of products – goods and services – that meet customer and applicable legal requirements, and

- Enhancement of customer satisfaction

The quality policy and the objectives are also a means of controlling the quality management system’s processes. Simply, if you want to control a process, assign an objective to it (or more) and make sure it is aligned to the quality policy, then monitor and measure the process’ performance against the assigned objective. You need to provide adequate resources to the process to ensure that it is capable of achieving the objective. You continually improve the whole process by upgrading the objective, make corrective and preventive actions or introduce innovation to it. Corrective action addresses an undesirable situation’s cause in order to prevent its recurrence. Preventive action, by contrast, addresses the probable cause of a potentially undesirable situation. This is what the quality policy and objectives are supposed to do. They provide focus, direction and control.

The quality objectives need to be consistent with the quality policy and the commitment to continual improvement, and their achievement needs to be measurable. The achievement of quality objectives can have a positive impact on product quality, operational effectiveness and financial performance and thus on the satisfaction and confidence of interested parties. When an organization has established a quality policy and a set of operational objectives, this means the only thing left to do is to design or plan the necessary processes or tasks that can realize those objectives. Therefore, the processes determine if the objectives will be met in full, partially or not at all. This is where the ISO 9001 standard play a critical role in specifying the required processes and the operating criteria. This is what ISO 9001 is all about. It even specifies criteria for the policy and the objectives.

A quality policy needs to satisfy the following requirements:

• It is appropriate to the purpose of the organization,
• It includes a commitment to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system,
• It provides a framework for establishing and reviewing quality objectives,
• It is communicated and understood within the organization, and
• It is reviewed for continuing suitability

Quality objectives must be established in order to enable the organization to comply with requirements and continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system. Quality objectives must achieve four things:

• Enable the organization to meet customer requirements
• Enable the organization to enhance customer satisfaction
• Enable the organization to comply with all legal requirements applicable to the product
• Continually contribute to the effectiveness of the quality management system

Therefore, when you are in the meeting room with your management brainstorming on the appropriate objectives, have these four points in mind.

ISO 9001:2000 requires that management periodically review changes to both the policy and objectives. An organization’s objectives must be measurable and its processes designed to meet those objectives. An organization’s overall business goals, quality objectives and quality policy are all interrelated and must work together to achieve business improvement. To do this, it’s necessary to understand which processes are key to achieving business goals and align those processes with the quality objectives. It means aligning business goals, quality objectives and process measures to create real improvement. And it means using process mapping. Process mapping involves more than just flow charting. Among other things, it can manage and improve processes by illustrating process measures as well as process flows and interactions. One process-mapping method begins by involving the people who work in the process. Another entails mapping the process as is, taking action to improve it and then preparing a final map of the improved process.

Process owners are directly responsible for the attainment of the objectives. They must be given adequate resources, including competent human resources. They need to review the objectives periodically to ensure the key performance indicators are heading towards their objectives on schedule. If not, they need to initiate corrective actions and if the risks of non-achievement are visible, take preventive actions to control them and steer the KPI’s back on course.

Examples of quality objectives:

• Production rejects <>
• Machine breakdown <>
• Returned products = 0/mth
• Purchasing >95% on-time delivery
• Inventory damage = 0/mth

Conclusion: ISO 9001 requires that the quality management system achieves its objectives in order to realize the quality policy.

Establishing Quality Policy In ISO 9001 Standards

Establishing Quality Policy In ISO 9001 Standards

The standard requires that top management establish

the quality policy.

ISO 9001 defines a quality policy as the overall

intentions and direction of an organization related to

quality as formally expressed by top management. It

also suggests that the policy be consistent with the

overall policy of the organization and provide a

framework for setting quality objectives. Further-

more ISO 9001 advises that the eight quality manage-

ment principles be used as a basis for forming the quality policy. The quality

policy can therefore be considered as the values, beliefs and rules that guide

actions, decisions and behaviours. A value may be ‘integrity’ and expressed as:

We will be open and honest in our dealings with those inside and outside the

organization. A rule may be ‘confidentiality’ and expressed as Company

information shall not be shared with those outside the organization. Both these are

also beliefs because it might be believed that deceiving people only leads to

failure in the long run. It might also be believed that disclosing confidential

information fuels the competition and will drive the organization out of

business. Both values guide actions, decisions and behaviours and hence may

be termed policies. They are not objectives because they are not achieved – they

are demonstrated by the manner in which actions and decisions are taken and

the way your organization behaves towards others.

The detail of quality policy will be addressed later. What is important in this

requirement is an understanding of why a quality policy is needed, what is

required to establish a quality policy and where it fits in relation to other

policies.

Defining the purpose or mission of the business is one thing but without

some guiding policies, the fulfilment of this mission may not happen unless

effort is guided in a common direction. If every manager chooses his or her

direction, and policies, the full potential of the organization would not be

realized. A shared vision is required that incorporates shared values and

shared policies.

The purpose of corporate policies is to influence the short and long-term

actions and decisions and to influence the direction in which the mission will

be fulfilled. If there were policies related to the organization’s customers, they

could be fulfilled at the expense of employees, shareholders and society. If

there were policies related to profit, without other policies being defined, profit

is positioned as a boundary condition to all actions and decisions. Clearly this

may not direct the organization towards its mission.

As stated above, the quality policy is the corporate policy and such policies

exist to channel actions and decisions along a path that will fulfil the

organization’s purpose and mission. A goal of the organization may be the

attainment of ISO 9001 certification and thus a quality policy of meeting the

requirements of ISO 9001 would be consistent with such a goal, but goals are not

the same as purpose as indicated in the box to the right. Clearly no organization

would have ISO 9000 certification as its purpose because certification is not a

reason for existence – an objective maybe but not a purpose.

Policies expressed as short catchy phrases such as “to be the best” really do

not channel actions and decisions. They become the focus of ridicule when the

organization’s fortunes change. There has to be a clear link from mission to

policy.

Policies are not expressed as vague statements or emphatic statements using

the words may, should or shall, but clear intentions by use of the words ‘we will’

– thus expressing a commitment or by the words ‘we are, we do, we don’t, we

have’ expressing shared beliefs. Very short statements tend to become slogans

which people chant but rarely understand the impact on what they do. Their

virtue is that they rarely become outdated. Long statements confuse people

because they contain too much for them to remember. Their virtue is that they

not only define what the company stands for but how it will keep its

promises.

In the ISO 9001 definition of quality policy it is suggested that the eight

quality management principles be used as a basis for establishing the policy.

One of these principles is the Customer Focus principle. By including in the

quality policy the intention to identify and satisfy the needs and expectations

of customers and other interested parties and the associated strategy by which

this will be achieved, this requirement would be fulfilled. The inclusion of the

strategy is important because the policy should guide action and decision.

Omitting the strategy may not ensure uniformity of approach and direction.

The standard requires that top management establish the quality policy.

ISO 9001 defines a quality policy as the overall intentions and direction of an organization related to quality as formally expressed by top management. It also suggests that the policy be consistent with the overall policy of the organization and provide a framework for setting quality objectives. Furthermore ISO 9001 advises that the eight quality management principles be used as a basis for forming the quality policy. The quality policy can therefore be considered as the values, beliefs and rules that guide actions, decisions and behaviours. A value may be ‘integrity’ and expressed as:

We will be open and honest in our dealings with those inside and outside the organization. A rule may be ‘confidentiality’ and expressed as Company information shall not be shared with those outside the organization. Both these are also beliefs because it might be believed that deceiving people only leads to failure in the long run. It might also be believed that disclosing confidential information fuels the competition and will drive the organization out of business. Both values guide actions, decisions and behaviours and hence may be termed policies. They are not objectives because they are not achieved – they are demonstrated by the manner in which actions and decisions are taken and the way your organization behaves towards others.

The detail of quality policy will be addressed later. What is important in this requirement is an understanding of why a quality policy is needed, what is required to establish a quality policy and where it fits in relation to other policies.

Defining the purpose or mission of the business is one thing but without some guiding policies, the fulfilment of this mission may not happen unless effort is guided in a common direction. If every manager chooses his or her direction, and policies, the full potential of the organization would not be realized. A shared vision is required that incorporates shared values and shared policies.

The purpose of corporate policies is to influence the short and long-term actions and decisions and to influence the direction in which the mission will be fulfilled. If there were policies related to the organization’s customers, they could be fulfilled at the expense of employees, shareholders and society. If there were policies related to profit, without other policies being defined, profit is positioned as a boundary condition to all actions and decisions. Clearly this may not direct the organization towards its mission.

As stated above, the quality policy is the corporate policy and such policies exist to channel actions and decisions along a path that will fulfil the organization’s purpose and mission. A goal of the organization may be the attainment of ISO 9001 certification and thus a quality policy of meeting the requirements of ISO 9001 would be consistent with such a goal, but goals are not the same as purpose as indicated in the box to the right. Clearly no organization would have ISO 9000 certification as its purpose because certification is not a reason for existence – an objective maybe but not a purpose.

Policies expressed as short catchy phrases such as “to be the best” really do not channel actions and decisions. They become the focus of ridicule when the organization’s fortunes change. There has to be a clear link from mission to policy.

Policies are not expressed as vague statements or emphatic statements using the words may, should or shall, but clear intentions by use of the words ‘we will’ – thus expressing a commitment or by the words ‘we are, we do, we don’t, we have’ expressing shared beliefs. Very short statements tend to become slogans which people chant but rarely understand the impact on what they do. Their virtue is that they rarely become outdated. Long statements confuse people because they contain too much for them to remember. Their virtue is that they not only define what the company stands for but how it will keep its promises.

In the ISO 9001 definition of quality policy it is suggested that the eight quality management principles be used as a basis for establishing the policy.

One of these principles is the Customer Focus principle. By including in the quality policy the intention to identify and satisfy the needs and expectations of customers and other interested parties and the associated strategy by which this will be achieved, this requirement would be fulfilled. The inclusion of the strategy is important because the policy should guide action and decision.

Omitting the strategy may not ensure uniformity of approach and direction.

ISO 9001:2008 FAQ

ISO 9001:2008 FAQ
What Is The ISO 9001: 2008 Standard?
The latest edition of the ISO 9001 standard ISO 9001: 2008, Quality Management Systems – Requirements, was officially published by (ISO) the International Organization for Standardization on November 14, 2008. It is the fourth edition of the ISO 9001 standard since it was first published in 1987.
Who Is Responsible For Revising The standards?
The ISO Technical Committee no.176, Sub-committee no.2 (ISO/TC 176/SC 2) is responsible for the revision process in collaboration with consensus among quality and industry experts nominated by ISO Member bodies, and representing all interested parties.
Does ISO 9001:2008 Have Additional Requirements Beyond ISO 9001:2000 ?
This latest (4th) edition of ISO 9001 contains no new requirements compared to the (3rd) year 2000 edition, which it replaces. What it does is provide clarification to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 based on eight years’ experience of worldwide implementing of the standard and introduces changes intended to improve consistency with the environmental management system standard, ISO 14001:2004.
The clarifications and changes in ISO 9001:2008 represents fine-tuning, rather than a thorough overhaul. It focuses on changes that organizations might make to better comply with the spirit of the standard without adding, deleting, or altering its requirements. The changes are minor in nature and address such issues as the need to clarify, provide greater consistency, resolve perceived ambiguities, and improve compatibility with ISO 14001. The numbering system and the structure of the standard remain unchanged. As a result, the new standard looks much like the old standard.
ISO has grouped the changes incorporated in this ISO 9001:2008 edition into the following categories:- No changes or minimum changes on user documents, including records- No changes or minimum changes to existing QMS processes- No additional training required or minimal training required- No effects on current certifications
In contrast, the 3rd edition, ISO 9001:2000 published in 2000, represented a major overhaul of the standard, including new requirements and a sharpened customer focus, reflecting developments in quality management and experience gained since the publication of the initial version.
Then Why Was It Necessary To Introduce This Revision?All ISO standards – currently more than 17 400 – are periodically reviewed. To ensure that ISO standards are maintained at the state of the art, ISO has a rule requiring them to be periodically reviewed and a decision taken to confirm, withdraw or revise the documents. The review process must be initiated within 3 years of publication of a standard. The review considers several factors such as technological evolution, new methods and materials, new quality and safety requirements, or questions of interpretation and application.
The review of ISO 9001 resulting in the 2008 edition was carried out by subcommittee SC 2 of ISO/TC 176. This subcommittee, which is responsible for the ISO 9000 family, unites expertise from 80 participating countries and 19 international or regional organizations, plus other technical committees.
This review has a number of inputs that help it:
A global user questionnaire/survey
A market Justification Study
Suggestions arising from the ISO/TC 176 interpretation process
Opportunities for increased compatibility with ISO 14001
The need for greater clarity, ease of use, and improved translation
Current trends – keeping up with recent developments in management system practices.
How Does The New ISO 9001 Edition Affect Existing ISO 9001 QMS’s?
As organizations start looking at ISO 9001:2008, they will wonder to what extent the changes might affect them. To a large extent, the new standard will not result in significant change to existing quality management systems (QMS).
ISO/TC 176 was careful in not making change for change sake. In the case of editorial changes, this was especially true. This could have lead to a false impression that there was a change in requirements, carrying greater significance than was intended. In those instances, when the committee members couldn’t come to a consensus in determining if a change added or deleted a requirement, they opted to retain the existing text. They decided it was better to err on the side of caution rather than to contribute to any misunderstanding in the marketplace.
The changes that have been incorporated into this edition of the ISO 9001 standard include changes that should lead to a better understanding across a broader range of product types, including service organizations; use of deliberate wording to minimize the potential for incorrect user interpretation; and reflect nuances of similar concepts. Lastly, some of the changes to specific clauses were made based on the 2004 International User Feedback Survey. This survey was conducted after the publication of ISO 9001:2000 and had invited respondents to identify areas they most wanted to see improved.

Update on ISO 9001:2008

Update on ISO 9001:2008
Following a recent meeting of ISO’s Technical Committee TC176 in Helsinki, Finland, from June
11 – 15t, 2007, publication of the new version of ISO 9001 has been brought forward from 2009
and is now scheduled to be published in October 2008. Experts representing over 70 ISO member
bodies, met to discuss the comments received during circulation of the Committee Draft (”CD”) of
the new standard, and concluded that in view of the very limited changes being proposed, the draft
is now sufficiently mature to progress directly to the DIS (Draft International Standard).
The main changes being introduced into the new standard are as follows:
Clause 0.2 (Process approach)
Text added to emphasize the importance of processes being capable of achieving desired outputs
Clause 1.1 (Scope)
Clarification that “product” also includes intermediate product
Explanation regarding statutory, regulatory and legal requirements
Clause 4.1 (General requirements)
Notes added to explain more about outsourcing
Types of control that may be applied to outsourced processes
Relationship to clause 7.4 (Purchasing)
Clarification that outsourced processes are still responsibility of the organization and must be
included in the quality management system
Clause 4.2.1 (Documentation)
Clarification that QMS documentation also includes records
Documents required by the standard may be combined
ISO 9001 requirements may be covered by more than one documented procedure
Clause 4.2.3 (Document control)
Clarification that only external documents relevant to the QMS need to be controlled
Clause 4.2.4 (Records control)
Editorial changes only (better alignment with ISO 14001)
Clause 5.5.2 (Management rep)
Clarifies that this must be a member of the organization’s own management
Clause 6.2.1 (Human resources)
Clarification that competence requirements are relevant for any personnel who are involved in the
operation of the quality management system
Clause 6.3 (Infrastructure)
Includes information systems as example
Clause 6.4 (Work environment)
Clarifies that this includes conditions under which work is performed and includes, for example
physical, environmental and other factors such as noise, temperature, humidity, lighting, or weather
Clause 7.2.1 (Customer related processes)
Clarifies that post-delivery activities may include:
- Actions under warranty provisions
- Contractual obligations such as maintenance services
- Supplementary services such as recycling or final disposal
Clause 7.3.1 (Design & development planning)
Clarifies that design and development review, verification and validation have distinct purposes
These may be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination as suitable for the product
and the organization
Clause 7.3.3(Design & development outputs)
Clarifies that information needed for production and service provision includes preservation of the product
Clause 7.5.4 (Customer property)
Explains that both intellectual property and personal data should be considered as customer property
Clause 7.6 (Now retitled Control of Monitoring and Measuring equipment)
Explanatory notes added regarding the use of computer software: “Confirmation of the ability of computer software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.”
Clause 8.2.1 (Customer satisfaction)
Note added to explain that monitoring of customer perception may include input from sources such as customer satisfaction surveys, customer data on delivered product quality, user opinion surveys, lost business analysis, compliments, and dealer reports
Clause 8.2.3 (Monitoring / Measurement of process)
Note added to clarify that when deciding on appropriate methods, the organization should consider impact on the conformity to product requirements and on the effectiveness of the quality management system.